Network Governance in Integrated Maritime Transportation Development in Southwest Papua

Main Article Content

Didik Iskandar
Muhammad Irvan Nur’ Iva
Muhammad Lutfi Siraj

Abstract

The development of integrated maritime transportation in Southwest Papua is essential for improving regional connectivity, reducing logistical barriers, and supporting equitable economic development across coastal and island communities. However, achieving an integrated transportation system remains challenging due to fragmented institutional responsibilities, limited coordination among stakeholders, and differences in organizational priorities. This study explores how network governance contributes to the development of integrated maritime transportation in Southwest Papua. A qualitative case study approach was employed, using in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis to collect data from government agencies, port authorities, transportation operators, local communities, and other relevant stakeholders. The data were analyzed through an interactive qualitative process involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that collaboration among organizations has been established, but its effectiveness is constrained by uneven levels of trust, varying degrees of stakeholder participation, limited agreement on shared objectives, and insufficient collective capacity to coordinate inter-organizational activities. These conditions reduce the effectiveness of collaborative governance and hinder the integration of maritime transportation services. Strengthening mutual trust, encouraging broader stakeholder participation, promoting shared goals, and enhancing institutional capacity are therefore critical to building an integrated, adaptive, and sustainable maritime transportation system capable of supporting long-term regional development in Southwest Papua.

Article Details

How to Cite
Didik Iskandar, Muhammad Irvan Nur’ Iva, & Muhammad Lutfi Siraj. (2026). Network Governance in Integrated Maritime Transportation Development in Southwest Papua. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences (IJoMS), 5(2), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.59066/ijoms.v5i2.2812
Section
Scope of Articles: Law, Government, and Politics

References

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book13050

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book44406

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217658

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887098

Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2006). A manager's guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. IBM Center for The Business of Government.

Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy for public construction projects: Critical success factors and policy implications. Journal of Facilities Management, 15(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-07-2016-0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1207865

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications